ANA RECEIPTS / BY JAY MANDEL

The applause.
The receipts.

Bob Liodice built a bigger ANA.
Did members get a better deal?

An evidence-led scorecard of the accomplishments, the unfinished business, and the value still waiting to be demonstrated.

Open the scorecard

This is how I work: question the promise, examine the evidence, and name what needs to change. Bring me the business problem everyone keeps talking around.

CEO: 2003–2026*Evidence cutoff: October 22, 2026

*Departure announced for the end of 2026. This is a leadership retrospective, not an obituary.

Satirical caricature of Bob Liodice receiving an oversized ANA trophy as robots applaud. Neglected industry problems are marked postponed.
SATIRE Satirical illustration, not a depiction of an actual ceremony.
GROWTH IS NOT ROI ✦ RESEARCH IS NOT REFORM ✦ APPLAUSE IS NOT ACCOUNTABILITY ✦ SHOW THE RECEIPTS ✦

THE SHORT VERSION

A bigger institution.
An unfinished case.

The evidence supports a tough critique, not a blanket conviction.

Institutional growth and consequential transparency research are real. So are persistent adoption gaps. But the reviewed public record does not establish the return members received for their dues.

EDITORIAL VERDICTExpansion: demonstrated.
Accountability: incomplete.
Member ROI: unproven.

01 / THE SCORECARD

And the award
goes to…

No invented letter grades. No false precision.
Just a judgment, the evidence, and its limits.

Showing all 7 findings
Delivered01

THE BIGGER TENT AWARD

He grew the institution.
That part is not in dispute.

188 → 1,600

Member companies, as reported by ANA

ANA credits Liodice’s tenure with membership expansion and five association acquisitions.

THE CALL

Strong evidence of organizational scale. Not, by itself, evidence of better economics for members.

What this does not prove +

The figures are ANA’s own account. Acquisitions contributed to growth; membership growth is not a measure of savings or satisfaction.

ANA leadership announcement ↗
Delivered02

THE TURNING-ON-THE-LIGHTS AWARD

The transparency
investigation delivered.

2016

The ANA-commissioned K2 investigation

The investigation documented nontransparent media-buying practices, including rebates, and put advertiser–agency conflicts squarely on the agenda.

THE CALL

Meaningful credit for exposing a consequential problem. Commissioning the work was a substantive act, not just a conference theme.

What this does not prove +

Documenting a problem does not establish that it was fixed, or that every agency engaged in the same practices.

ANA / K2 media transparency report ↗
Delivered03

THE SOMETHING-TO-SHOW AWARD

Useful tools.
A concrete improvement case.

−31.4%

Kimberly-Clark TrueCPM, partner-reported

A benchmark partner reported lower TrueCPM and 45.7% more True Impressions per dollar for Kimberly-Clark. ANA also offers research, training, and peer networks.

THE CALL

“Nothing of value” is too strong. There are tangible tools and reported gains worth acknowledging.

What this does not prove +

This is a partner-reported case, not independent proof that ANA caused all the gains or that the typical member achieved them.

Fell short04

THE UNFINISHED SEQUEL AWARD

A decade later,
basic controls still lagged.

57%Had guidelines
63%Addressed it in contracts

Among 114 qualified respondents to ANA’s 2026 principal-media study, controls remained uneven. ANA’s June retrospective itself said progress was insufficient.

THE CALL

A weak implementation record for an issue central to ANA’s mission. Raising awareness is not the same as securing adoption.

What this does not prove +

These are survey results, not a census. Principal media means an agency buys inventory and resells it; the model is not inherently fraudulent. ANA cannot unilaterally rewrite members’ contracts.

Fell short05

THE LESS-THAN-HALF-FULL AWARD

Better efficiency.
Still a sobering result.

45.1%

TrueAdSpend in the Q2 2026 benchmark

The benchmark improved from 43.3% in Q1. It tracks spend reaching measurable, viewable, fraud-free, non–made-for-advertising impressions.

THE CALL

Progress deserves credit. The remaining gap makes a victory lap premature.

What this does not prove +

This is a measured programmatic sample, not the entire advertising economy. It is neither ROI nor evidence that the other 54.9% was fraud. The benchmark separately reports transaction costs.

Fiducia / ANA Q2 2026 benchmark ↗
Unproven06

THE MISSING RECEIPT AWARD

What did a member
actually get back?

Not established.

Value for dues across the membership

The reviewed sources show benefits offered and individual results. They do not establish a membership-wide, independently validated return on dues.

THE CALL

The strongest critique is an accountability gap: make the realized savings, adoption, and attributable outcomes visible.

What this does not prove +

Not established in this review does not mean zero value, or that no member has performed its own evaluation. ANA offers utilization reports to member representatives, but those are not a public, aggregate ROI study.

What ANA says membership provides ↗
Unproven07

THE BIG-BILL QUESTION

Scale demands scrutiny.
It does not prove waste.

The financial footprint below is substantial. Calling it “bloat” requires evidence about efficiency and member outcomes, not just large numbers.

THE CALL

Ask for the performance ledger alongside the expense ledger. The public record reviewed here does not settle the value-for-money question.

Examine the financial snapshot ↓

“Delivered,” “Fell short,” and “Unproven” are editorial assessments. The numbers are sourced facts, with scope and limitations stated.

02 / FOLLOW THE MONEY

The institutional
price tag.

Association of National Advertisers
Fiscal year 2024 · IRS Form 990

Total revenue$80.48M$80,475,015
Total expenses$82.23M$82,234,900
Accounting deficit$1.76MExpenses exceeded revenue by $1,759,885
Liodice total compensation$1.56M$1,506,383 reportable + $53,423 other
SELECTED REVENUEFY2024
Membership dues
$31,793,395
Cross-media measurement
$14,432,500
Sponsorship
$9,696,314
Training & conferences
$6,937,886

Selected categories, not the full revenue total.

READ THE FINE PRINT

Big numbers are a question.
Not a verdict.

The deficit is an accounting result, not a cash-burn measure. Compensation is not base salary alone. These filings do not, on their own, prove waste.

Read the full FY2024 return ↗

03 / BEFORE THE STANDING OVATION

Three questions
still worth asking.

  1. 01

    What changed for members?

    Show independently validated, attributable outcomes, not just participation, reports, and organizational growth.

  2. 02

    What actually got adopted?

    Publish the share of members using contract protections, audits, and buying controls, with progress over time.

  3. 03

    What was the realized return?

    Separate verified savings from projected opportunities. Put results next to the cost of membership.

04 / NO FOOTNOTES, NO CASE

The method.
The source trail.

Sharp in tone. Careful with the record.

How to read this scorecard

This is an editorial assessment of a leadership record, not an audit, legal finding, or quantitative performance rating. Organizational outcomes cannot automatically be attributed to one executive.

Primary ANA materials establish what ANA reports. The tax return documents finances. Partner-reported benchmarks offer outcome evidence with attribution and sample limitations. Absence of evidence in these records is not proof of absence.

Satirical award titles and imagery are invented commentary. They do not represent actual honors, quotes, or conduct. There is no allegation here of theft, corruption, personal fraud, or universal advertising fraud.

Research cutoff: October 22, 2026. Liodice remained CEO at that date; his announced departure was planned for year-end.

  1. ANA · April 2026Leadership departure & organizational growth ↗
  2. ANA / K2 · 2016Media transparency investigation ↗
  3. ANA · March 2026Principal-media survey ↗
  4. ANA · June 2026Ten years of media transparency ↗
  5. Fiducia / ANA · Q2 2026Programmatic transparency benchmark ↗
  6. ANA · MembershipResearch, education & member services ↗
  7. IRS Form 990 · FY2024 · via ProPublicaANA full tax return ↗

THE LAST WORD

Applause is easy.
Accountability needs receipts.

Back to the top ↑

WORK WITH JAY

Like how Jay thinks?
Hire him.

You’re hiring my judgment. My candor. My willingness to ask the uncomfortable question—and stay to help fix the problem.

I’m Jay Mandel, a business consultant, coach, and author of Brand Strategy in Three Steps. My background includes Mastercard and IBM. I work with founders, leaders, and teams on strategy, communication, and delivery.

I help leaders name the real problem, test the claims, and turn the findings into action. Put that thinking to work on your positioning, your customer experience, or the gap between what your team promises and what it delivers. We’ll start with the problem and decide what work would help.

Chat with Jay about your business

Start a conversation

How can I help?

Ask a question or share what you’re working through.

AI conversation · Opens SuperMeAsk Jay’s AIExplore Jay’s ideas with his SuperMe AI in a new tab.